South Dakota Senators Reject Bills To Repeal Medical Marijuana Program After Federal Rescheduling And Limit THC Potency
- South Dakota lawmakers rejected two bills that aimed to end the state’s medical marijuana program after federal rescheduling of cannabis and to impose strict THC potency caps on medical cannabis products.
- The Senate Health and Human Services Committee unanimously voted against repealing the medical cannabis program and mostly opposed the proposal to limit THC potency to 5% for oils and 60% for concentrates.
- The Marijuana Policy Project and the state Department of Health opposed both bills, emphasizing that repealing the program would harm 18,000 patients and that THC caps lack scientific support and would restrict patient access to effective treatments.
- These legislative decisions follow earlier defeats of bills related to cannabis, including attempts to ban intoxicating hemp products and allow medical cannabis use in hospitals for terminally ill patients, reflecting ongoing contention over cannabis policy in South Dakota.
South Dakota lawmakers have rejected a pair of bills that would have ended the state’s medical marijuana program if the plant is federally rescheduled and to set strict THC potency caps on cannabis products for patients.
The Senate Health and Human Services Committee on Wednesday took up both measures from Sen. John Carley (R), rejecting the medical marijuana repeal bill in a 7-0 vote and the potency proposal in a 6-1 vote.
Under the first bill, South Dakota’s voter-approved medical cannabis program would have been eliminated 90 days after the federal government finalized the rescheduling of marijuana under the Controlled Substance Act (CSA)—a policy change that’s actively in the works, as President Donald Trump in December ordered that process to be expeditiously completed.
“Rescheduling cannabis from Schedule l to Schedule lll does not make medical cannabis accessible nationwide,” the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) said in an action alert ahead of the vote. “It is cruel and cynical to marry the two issues and eliminate a program 70 percent of voters enacted, just as federal law recognizes the efficacy of medical cannabis.”
“If SB 181 passed, South Dakota’s medical cannabis program would strip legal protections and safe access from 18,000 patients,” it said. “Forty states have medical programs. None have repealed their state’s medical cannabis programs.”
In testimony to the committee, the state Department of Health voiced opposition to the legislation.
Carley’s other bill would have made it so medical cannabis products available to patients couldn’t exceed 5 percent THC for oils or 60 percent for liquid concentrates. The Senate panel also soundly defeated that proposal.
“The THC potency cap is not based on scientific research for what is best for medical patients,” MPP said. “This would deprive patients of the products that work best for them.”
— Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. —
These votes come weeks after senators separately voted not to take up a measure to ban intoxicating hemp cannabinoid products.
Also last month, the House Health and Human Services Committee rejected a bill that would have allowed terminally ill patients to use medical cannabis in hospitals and hospices.
Around this time last year, Rep. Travis Ismay (R) attempted to repeal the state’s medical marijuana program, but his proposal was also defeated in committee.
Photo courtesy of Philip Steffan.