Trump trade team turning to AI to track alleged transshipment tariff dodging for China
- The Trump administration is creating an AI-powered “detective border” system to identify and prevent tariff evasion by detecting suspicious trade activities linked to China and its trading partners.
- A White House report highlights over 40 countries, including major U.S. allies and neighbors like Mexico, Canada, the EU, India, Japan, and South Korea, as enablers of illegal transshipment that helps China skirt U.S. tariffs.
- Illegal transshipment leads to significant U.S. tariff revenue losses estimated between $19 billion and $34 billion annually, while benefiting the transit countries through local economic gains such as jobs, tax receipts, and logistics revenue.
- The AI system will analyze shipment data, production capacity, ownership, packaging, and X-ray images to detect discrepancies and illegal activity, aiming to improve enforcement that has traditionally been slow and focused only on large, complex cases.
The Trump administration is developing an AI-powered “detective border” to crack down on trading partners suspected of enabling China to skirt tariffs on U.S. imports.
In a report released Thursday, the White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy accused dozens of countries of being part of China’s “shadow transshipment network,” sorting them “according to the scale of China-linked trade, the depth of their economic integration with China, and the weak-link advantages that make them susceptible to rerouting activity.”
The values of these goods, described as flowing through third countries to evade levies on imports and other trade remedies, are based on analysis from two government and three private-sector sources.
AI supply chain firm Exiger provided a mid-range estimate of $75 billion in illegally transshipped goods between February 2025 and February 2026, which corresponds to a loss of tariff revenue between US$19 billion and $34 billion.
More than 40 countries are associated with elevated illegal transshipment risk, the report from White House trade adviser Peter Navarro’s office said, and “China’s biggest enablers range from Mexico and Canada on U.S. land borders to the European Union, India, Japan, and South Korea.”
In addition to China preserving access to the U.S. market counter to U.S. trade policy, “the spoils of illegal transshipment also enrich the transshipping countries themselves,” the report said. “Local firms capture assembly fees, warehousing revenue, logistics margins, port charges, customs brokerage income, land rents, and export-processing-zone investment. Governments benefit from jobs, tax receipts, foreign investment, and trade growth.”
Other named countries include Indonesia, Thailand, Brazil and Malaysia. Still others are noted for comparative advantages that can be exploited, like the cost of labour, strategic port access, lax customs enforcement or free trade zones.
The trend isn’t new. When President Donald Trump imposed high tariffs on exports from China in his first term, many businesses responded by diversifying their supply chains, moving some manufacturing outside of China when possible. This so-called China +1 strategy spurred big investments in Vietnam, Cambodia and other countries, often by Chinese-owned factories.
Upon returning to office, Trump unleashed a wave of country-specific duties with some of the highest rates aimed at U.S. allies and major trading partners. Tens of billions of dollars in tariffs have hit compliant importers especially hard.
“Detective Border”
The White House’s report acknowledges these “tariff differentials” can increase the incentive to illegally transship, but said tools designed to “detect, deter and prevent” tariff evasion are being deployed. Those tools include an AI-powered “detective border” that will scan shipment data against routing histories, confirm production capacity and ownership relationships and even analyze packaging patterns and X-ray imaging at ports to detect mismatches between what’s declared and what’s actually in a container.
U.S. trade enforcement authorities have for decades focused limited resources on cases with the biggest payout potential. Such cases are complex and often take years to build, meaning illicit goods often continue flowing into the U.S. market at below fair-market prices, undermining U.S. commerce.
Illegal transshipment can be notoriously hard to detect and determining country of origin is complex, especially when imports are made from components manufactured in multiple countries. It’s unclear how much of the supply chain shift outlined in the report reflects illicit activity rather than legitimate changes to global production and trade.
“Effective enforcement therefore requires distinguishing legitimate manufacturing and substantial transformation from pass-through trade and origin shifting,” the report said.